Yigal Amir's Furlough Request Denied Amid Security Concerns

Larissa Amir Trimbobler, the wife of Yigal Amir, who assassinated Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in 1995, has publicly criticized National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir following the denial of her husband's request for a brief furlough to visit his sick father. Amir submitted the request on September 9, citing a decline in his father's health, which has raised concerns among family members.

Trimbobler stated that the process of applying for the furlough involved filling out extensive forms and providing details about guarantors, which led to a sense of hope that the request might be granted. She expressed frustration over the rejection, questioning whether appeals made to Ben Gvir would have any impact on the decision. From her perspective, the request was humanitarian in nature, and she criticized the minister for not exercising his authority to approve such an exceptional furlough.

In her remarks, Trimbobler suggested that Ben Gvir could have benefited politically by approving the request, as it was a clearly humanitarian issue that would not have drawn negative media attention. She noted that Amir's attorney received the official denial, which cited his dangerousness and the positions of intelligence and security officials as reasons for the rejection. The response also indicated that the medical documentation provided did not justify the furlough on health grounds.

Approved for Dissemination

Trimbobler sharply criticized the assertion of Amir's dangerousness, arguing that allowing a 56-year-old prisoner, who has already spent over three decades in prison, to visit his seriously ill father would not pose a threat to national security. She also contested the claim that there was insufficient medical justification for the furlough, highlighting her father's serious health issues, including cancer and multiple heart surgeries.

She expressed her belief that the medical condition of Amir's father should have been sufficient grounds for granting the furlough, lamenting that it seems only extreme circumstances would warrant such consideration. The situation raises questions about the balance between security concerns and humanitarian considerations in cases involving long-term prisoners.